![]() |
Business Mediation & Collaboration Services
![]() |
|||||
| info@bmcassociates.com (888) 922-1262 | >>
For Partners & Owners |
>> For Family Businesses |
>>
For Other Organizations |
>>
For Families with Estates |
>>
For Advisors |
|
"The central innovation of holistic estate planning is the full involvement of the adult beneficiaries in conversations with their parents in the early stages of the planning proves, which allows the broadest range of concerns to be addressed." David Gage, Ph.D., Principal |
Choosing the Right Partner
With a sizable percentage of orthodontists entertaining the idea of selling a practice, taking
on an associate or partner, or just slowing down, the subject of transition has become more topical than ever. Over the next few editions of this column, we will explore various aspects of transitions. We begin with an article by David Gage, a psychologist who specializes in helping businesses establish good partnerships. The success of a partnership depends on many factors, but in
Dr. Gage's view, the keys are similar values and compatible personalities. A psychological assessment of the potential partners uses interviews and testing to obtain
personality information that can be compared with norms for those instruments. Dr. Gage feels
this eliminates much of the guesswork and establishes a more scientific and quantifiable basis on
which to evaluate the potential for a good fit. If you are considering a partnership, you may find that taking the extra step of hiring an
experienced psychologist will increase your chances of a successful outcome. - HOWARD D. IBA, DDS, MS Choosing the Right Partner Choosing a professional partner is one of the
most important decisions you'll ever make.
The quality of your relationship can influence
how you feel about going to work in the morning
and how well you sleep at night. Your choice of
a partner will significantly affect your staff, too,
and therefore the well-being of your practice.
Last, but certainly not least, your choice of a
partner will affect the lives and welfare of your
patients. The High Cost of Failed Partnerships Finding a partner with whom you can work
well is critical for yet another reason: the high
cost of a bad decision. A Cleveland oral surgeon
recalls the dire consequences of a decision to add
a third person to what was previously a successful two-person partnership: "After six weeks, it
was more than obvious it was not going to work.
There were major character flaws and problems
that we hadn't picked up on-to the point where
it was noticeable to our patient and referral population." Thanks to a strong contract and documentation of the third surgeon's shortcomings,
the owner was eventually able to cure that mistake, but the effect on his practice was traumatic.
Some doctors who have lived through partnership disasters have no desire to ever get
involved with a partner again. That's understandable, but without a partner, expanding a practice
or making the transition to retirement can be much more difficult. Those who have never
experienced a bad partnership may think that
choosing the wrong partner is like choosing the
wrong office manager, only a little worse. It's
two most crucial factors in determining whether
a candidate and a practice owner are likely to
develop a truly successful partnership, there are
two fundamental questions that psychologists try
to answer: Studies have demonstrated that while physical appearance governs our first impressions of
people, personalities are what make living or
working together day after day, year after year,
either a joy or a nightmare. Psychologists have
exhaustively studied what makes some personalities click and others come to blows. They put
that knowledge to use everywhere from the locker rooms of professional sports teams to the
boardrooms of multinational corporations. People tend to respond to other people and
to circumstances in predictable ways. Personality
testing gives us that information. It also tells us
what types of environments people are most
comfortable in and what motivates them. We
learn about probable strengths, possible weaknesses, and the defenses people have built up
over a lifetime. Importantly, testing also tells us
about whether-and specifically how-people's
behavior changes under stressful conditions in
the workplace. Accurately assessing anyone's personality
is never as simple as giving one test. As in dental research, multiple tests allow hypotheses to
be compared and their validity judged. Taken
together, such tests can provide a complete picture of each potential partner's personality. In
fact, the typical reaction from people when they
read about themselves in this way is astonishment that they could be described so thoroughly
and accurately. The challenge then is to determine whether
the personalities involved can work well together. Most candidates will fit well in someone's
practice, but any given candidate will work better with some owners and less well with others. When a Spartanburg, South Carolina,
orthodontist wanted to bring on a partner about
two years ago as part of his transition to retirement, he told the candidate he would feel more
comfortable if they underwent a psychological
evaluation. The candidate agreed it was a good
idea. On one test, their scores were virtually
identical in three of the four categories, but
almost diametrically opposite in the other. The
test identified the candidate as a "thinking" person and the orthodontist as a "feeling" person.
That contrast, which in other circumstances
could be a red flag, "works out great", the orthodontist says, "because we need both of those in a
practice. We've had a couple of instances come
up where I feel real sorry for someone, but I
shouldn't," and his new partner has provided a
reality check. For his part, the new partner says
the test raised his awareness that he must pay
attention to his "feeling" side, even though he
can't duplicate the orthodontist's personality. When the Cleveland oral surgeon's partner
of 13 years eventually decided to retire, the surgeon knew he couldn't afford to repeat their earlier, disastrous mistake. He and a prospective
new partner had a partnership assessment performed. The result, almost six years later: they
enjoy a solid and successful partnership. Values, the underpinnings of all major decisions, usually function just beyond our awareness. Even though values are difficult to assess,
they are critically important to the long-term survival of all partnerships. Sooner or later, an issue
will arise whose resolution will depend on the
partners' values. It might be over whether to fire
an employee, or whether to invest personal capital to upgrade equipment. Regardless of the
issue, if partners' values are significantly different, something will eventually cause those differences to become apparent. Trying to ascertain the values of another
person without sophisticated tools is even more
difficult than trying to decipher another person's
personality. People have a penchant for describing their values in terms they think others want to
hear. Values are laden with what we call "social
desirability". Psychologists determine a person's values with a test that requires rating how strongly the
person subscribes to dozens of value statements.
Rankings for the candidate and the existing partners are compared. As with personality testing,
there are no wrong answers; what matters is how
well the values match up. Making the Decision When a psychologist combines the results
of the various personality and values tests with
the material gathered from interviews, a great
deal of information on differences and similarities always emerges. Differences aren't necessarily bad. But it's also true that similarities aren't
always good. In particular, some personality
traits that may make for a good relationship in a
social situation may be problematic at work and vice versa. It's the psychologist's responsibility to
determine-relying on research, years of analyzing psychological profiles, and, ideally, extensive
experience with partnerships-whether the patterns that emerge from the data are likely to be
harmful or beneficial in the long run.
DAVID GAGE, PHD |
|
|
|
|
|
|